| 1,550 | 0 | 289 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
教育公平是教育治理的核心价值取向。本研究使用文献计量法分析了1991-2024年间国际教育公平研究的时空分布、主题热点、知识基础、脉络演进与未来趋势。结果显示，当前国际教育公平研究处于快速成长期，美国、英国、澳大利亚和南非是国际教育公平研究的中心力量。教育公平的研究热点集中分布在群体差异、社会文化环境、教育类型层级、学校实践与教育不平等的关系这四个方面，新自由主义、批判种族理论、后现代女性主义等理论思潮则为这些研究热点提供了坚实的知识基础。三十余年来，该领域研究经历了从关注群体差异、促进社会正义的综合性教育公平问题研究，转向聚焦不同阶段、不同领域的具体性教育公平问题研究的脉络演进，而未来该领域则呈现出质性研究方法应用持续增多、全球地域化理念被重新重视、承认正义理念被普遍认同、多元文化教育理论蓬勃发展，以及自由主义与保守主义公平观交替凸显的趋势。借鉴上述趋势，我国研究者要瞄准高质量教育公平发展，树立“以人为中心”的教育公平观，加强教育公平研究的系统化设计，推动教育公平研究的具体实践转向，并加强多元研究方法的运用，推动我国教育公平研究融入国际话语体系，并贡献中国方案。
Abstract：Educational equity is the core value orientation of education governance. Using bibliometric methods, this study analyzes the temporal and spatial distribution, thematic hotspots, knowledge bases, frontier evolution, and future trends of international research on educational equity over the past three decades. The results show that current international research on educational equity is in a period of rapid growth, with the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and South Africa being the core forces in this field. Research hotspots of educational equity focus on four aspects: group differences, sociocultural environments,educational levels and types, and the relationship between school practices and educational inequality. Theoretical trends such as neoliberalism, critical race theory, and postmodern feminism provide a solid knowledge foundation for these research hotspots. Over the past three decades, research in this field has evolved from focusing on comprehensive educational equity issues to focusing on specific educational equity issues in different stages and fields. In the future, this field will show trends including a continuous increase in the application of qualitative research methods, renewed emphasis on the concept of glocalization, widespread acceptance of the concept of recognition justice, vigorous development of multicultural education theories, and alternating prominence of liberal and conservative views on equity.Drawing on these trends, Chinese researchers should aim for the development of high-quality educational equity, establish a "people-centered" view of educational equity, strengthen the systematic design of educational equity research, promote the shift of educational equity research toward specific practices, and enhance the application of diverse research methods—so as to integrate Chinese educational equity research into international academia and contribute Chinese solutions.
(1)章露红.二十年来我国教育公平研究的学术进展:基于1994-2014年间的文献分析[J].复旦教育论坛, 2015(4):39-45, 56.
(2)袁同凯,郭淑蓉.回顾、评述与反思:教育公平问题研究综述[J].民族教育研究, 2013, 24(6):5-10.
(3)魏先龙,王运武.近十年中国教育信息化促进教育公平研究综述[J].现代教育技术, 2015, 25(2):12-18.
(4)陈新忠,卢瑶.我国高等教育公平研究的现状、热点与前沿:基于CNKI数据库2005-2014年文献的可视化分析[J].国家教育行政学院学报, 2016(9):32-38.
(5)热孜万古丽·阿巴斯.热点与前沿:我国教育公平研究的可视化分析:以CSSCI(1998-2016)文献数据为例[J].教育探索, 2018(3):4-12.
(6)潘海林,朱文芳.基于知识图谱的我国教育公平研究进展及趋势[J].继续教育研究, 2022(1):92-95.
(7)王学男,李五一.建国以来我国教育公平问题的回顾与反思:兼谈对教育本质是追求抑或遮蔽[J].北京大学教育评论,2015, 13(4):177-183.
(1)罗式胜.关于普赖斯曲线方程参数b的讨论[J].情报理论与实践, 1994(1):13-14.
(1)SULLIVAN A L, BAL A. Disproportionality in special education:effects of individual and school variables on disability risk[J].Exceptional Children, 2013(4):475-494.
(2)BAKER B. The hunt for disability:the new eugenics and the normalization of school children[J].Teachers College Record, 2002,104(4):663-703.
(1)CASTAGNO A E."I don’t want to hear that!":legitimating whiteness through silence in schools[J]. Anthropology&Education Quarterly, 2008(3):35-42.
(2)MICKELSON R A. Subverting swann:first-and second-generation segregation in the charlotte-mecklenburg schools[J].American Educational Research Journal, 2001, 38(2):215-252.
(3)MILLER D I., EAGLY A H., LINN M C. Women’ s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes:evidence from 66 nations[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2015, 107(3):631-644.
(4)STECK A K., PERRY D. Challenging heteronormativity:creating a safe and inclusive environment for LGBTQ students[J].Journal of school violence, 2018, 17(2):227-243.
(5)STRAND S. Ethnicity, gender, social class and achievement gaps at age 16:intersectionality and‘getting it’ for the white working class[J]. Research Papers in Education, 2014, 29(2):131-171.
(6)NIETO S. Lessons from students on creating a chance to dream[J]. Harvard Educational Review, 1994, 64(4):392-426.
(7)森,霍索恩.生活水平[M].沈国华,译.北京:机械工业出版社, 2015:56-58.
(1)WALKER M, UNTERHALTER E. Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education[M]. New York:Palgrave Macmillan, 2007:184-202.
(2)GRAY J, BERESFORD Q A."Formidable challenge":Australia’s quest for equity in indigenous education[J]. Australian Journal of Education, 2008, 52(2):197-223.
(3)SULLIVAN A L. Disproportionality in special education identification and placement of English language learners[J].Exceptional Children, 2011, 77(3):317-334.
(4)BOLIVER V. Expansion, differentiation, and the persistence of social class inequalities in British higher education[J]. Higher Education, 2011, 61(3):229-242.
(5)MARGINSON S. The worldwide trend to high participation higher education:dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems[J]. Higher Education, 2016, 72(4):413-434.
(1)PHILIP T M, SOUTO-MANNING M, ANDERSON L. Making justice peripheral by constructing practice as"core":how the increasing prominence of core practices challenges teacher education[J]. Journal of Teacher Education, 2019, 70(3):251-264.
(2)U.S. Department of Education. The state of racial diversity in the educator workforce[EB/OL].(2016-03-15)[2024-09-20].https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/highered/racial-diversity/state-racial-diversity-workforce.pdf.
(3)TSENG A. Culturally sustaining pedagogies:teaching and learning for justice in a changing world[J]. Language and Education,2019(2):181-185.
(4)ORFIELD G, KUCSERA J, SIEGEL-HAWLEY G. E pluribus...separation:deepening double segregation for more students[J/OL]. UCLA:The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, 2012. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8g58m2v9.
(5)AZZARITO L, MACDONALD D, DAGKAS S. Revitalizing the physical education social-justice agenda in the global era:where do we go from here?[J]. Quest, 2017, 69(2):205-219.
(6)LEE V E, SMITH J B. High school size:which works best and for whom[J]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1997,19(3):205-227.
(7)CHANG M J, ASTIN A W, KIM D. Cross-racial interaction among undergraduates:some consequences, causes, and patterns[J].Research in Higher Education, 2004, 45(5):529-553.
(1)THEOHARIS G. Social justice educational leaders and resistance:toward a theory of social justice leadership[J]. Educational Administration Quarterly, 2007, 43(2):221-258.
(2)WILSON C D, TAYLOR J A, KOWALSKI S M. The relative effects and equity of inquiry:based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation[J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2010, 47(3):276-301.
(3)JANSSEN J, ERKENS G, KANSELAAR G. Visualization of participation:does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning[J]. Computers&Education, 2007, 49(4):1037-1065.
(4)MILNER I V, RICHARD H. What does teacher education have to do with teaching? implications for diversity studies[J]. Journal of Teacher Education, 2010, 61(1):118-131.
(5)DARLING H L. Performance-based assessment and educational equity[J]. Harvard Educational Review, 1994, 64(1):5-30.
(6)WILLINGHAM W W, POLLACK J M, LEWIS C. Grades and test scores:accounting for observed differences[J]. Journal of Educational Measurement. 2002, 39(1):1-37.
(7)陈超美,陈悦,侯剑华,等. Cite SpaceⅡ:科学文献中新趋势与新动态的识别与可视化[J].情报学报, 2009, 28(3):401-421.
(1)贺武华.公共教育改革中的新自由主义思想取向与反思[J].教育研究, 2009, 30(9):79-85.
(2)佐藤学,田辉.全球化时代的日本学校教育改革:危机与改革的构想[J].教育研究, 2006(1):49-53.
(3)姜添辉.专题:新自由主义与教育[J].教育学报, 2020, 16(3):3.
(4)AU W. Meritocracy 2.0:high-Stakes, standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism[J]. Educational Policy,2016, 30(1):39-62.
(5)李欣.美国批判种族理论教育存废之争:学术溯源、教育实践及党派博弈[J].世界民族, 2022(6):57-67.
(1)DELGADO R, STEFANCIC J. Critical race theory:an introduction[M]. New York:New York University Press, 2017:1-14.
(2)FUNEZ-FLORES J I, PINHEIRO W A, MENDOZA A V, et al. The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education and decolonial theory[J]. London Review of Education, 2024, 22(1):32-41.
(3)田友谊,林静.文化可持续教学与多元融合[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2017, 56(5):166-176.
(4)RINGROSE J. Successful girls? complicating post-feminist, neoliberal discourses of educational achievement and gender equality[J]. Gender&Education, 2007, 19(4):471-489.
(1)VILLEGAS A M. Dispositions in teacher education:a look at social justice[J]. Journal of Teacher Education, 2007(5):370-380.
(2)REAY D. The zombie staking English schools:social class and eucational inequality[J]. British Journal of Educational Studies,2006, 54(3):288-307.
(3)MCDONALD M A. The integration of social justice in teacher Education:dimensions of prospective teachers’ opportunities to learn[J]. Journal of Teacher Education, 2005, 56(5):418-435.
(1)GALE T. Widening and expanding participation in Australian higher education:in the absence of sociological imagination[J].The Australian Educational Researcher, 2015, 42(2):257-271.
(2)李杰,陈超美. Cite Space科技文本挖掘及可视化[M].北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社, 2016:126-127.
(3)王文,王纾.学习投入研究的知识图景及趋势:基于科学引文数据库的分析[J].教育研究, 2021, 42(8):78-91.
(1)RIZVI F, LINGARD B. Globalizing education policy[M]. London:Routledge, 2009:14-21.
(2)Council on Social Work Education. Educational policy and accreditation standards[EB/OL].(2015-06-15)[2025-02-13].https://www.cswe.org/getattachment/Accreditation/Standards-and-Policies/2015-EPAS/2015EPASand Glossary.pdf.
(3)ROBERTSON R. Glocalization:time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity[J]. Global Modernities, 1995(1):1-12.
(4)AMARTYA S. The idea of justice[M]. London:Penguin Books, 2009:231-235.
(5)TIKLY L, BARRETT A M. Social justice, capabilities and the quality of education in low income countries[J]. International Journal of Educational Development, 2011(1):3-14.
(1)LADSON-BILLINGS G. Critical race theory in education[M]//APPLE M W, AU W, GANDIN L A. The routledge international handbook of critical education. London:Routledge, 2009:110-122.
(2)LADSON-BILLINGS G. Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0:aka the remix[J]. Harvard Educational Review, 2014, 84(1):74-84.
(3)PARIS D, ALIM H S. Culturally sustaining pedagogies:teaching and learning for justice in a changing world[M]. New York:Teacher’s College Press, 2017:1-15.
(1)郝文武.高质量教育公平的本质特征与价值追求[J].教育研究, 2023, 44(10):22-32.
(2)褚宏启.新时代需要什么样的教育公平:研究问题域与政策工具箱[J].教育研究, 2020, 41(2):4-16.
(1)褚宏启.推进微观教育公平:科任教师能做什么[J].中小学管理, 2020(10):59.
(2)程天君.新教育公平引论:基于我国教育公平模式变迁的思考[J].教育发展研究, 2017, 37(2):1-11.
(3)王树涛,顾建民.国际教育科学研究范式的演变与趋势:基于2010-2019年文献计量的分析[J].教育研究, 2020, 41(9):135-145.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G353.1;G511
引用信息:
[1]王树涛,刘晶晶,刘天泽.国际教育公平的研究热点、知识基础与前沿趋势[J].比较教育学报,2026,No.361(01):3-22.
2025-10-14
2025-10-14
2025-10-14